Clustering/Failover

We're looking at moving to the newest version of SQL when it's released. In
order to take advantage of the clustering capabilities of SQL, do we also
have to cluster at the OS level, or can you have a SQL cluster running on two
stand-alone Windows Servers?
Thanks!
Molnir,
Might take a look at:
http://www.databasejournal.com/featu...le.php/3444181
and
High Availability and Failover Clustering at:
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/pro...ilability.mspx
HTH
Jerry
"Molnir" <Molnir@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:B171CF4B-BC63-46D9-88DF-D8F855581A8B@.microsoft.com...
> We're looking at moving to the newest version of SQL when it's released.
> In
> order to take advantage of the clustering capabilities of SQL, do we also
> have to cluster at the OS level, or can you have a SQL cluster running on
> two
> stand-alone Windows Servers?
> Thanks!
|||You might save yourself some frustration and also look at Neverfail
(www.neverfialgroup.com)
Jo
Molnir wrote:
> We're looking at moving to the newest version of SQL when it's released. In
> order to take advantage of the clustering capabilities of SQL, do we also
> have to cluster at the OS level, or can you have a SQL cluster running on two
> stand-alone Windows Servers?
> Thanks!