Showing posts with label experience. Show all posts
Showing posts with label experience. Show all posts

Thursday, February 16, 2012

Clustering - Active / Active nodes

I do not have any experience with MS SQL. I'm a hardware engineer. I focus
mainly on the servers hardware and connectivity.
I was wondering, is it possible to cluster 2 (or more) nodes running all
nodes on active / active as a single MS SQL database system? The servers are
connecting to a common shared storage system.
Is this possible? This is more of a scale out strategy.
Thanks
I am sorry to tell you that is not. A database will only run on one machine
at a time. Clustering will not help you with this problem.
Cheers,
Rod
MVP - Windows Server - Clustering
http://www.nw-america.com - Clustering Website
http://www.msmvps.com/clustering - Blog
"Alistair Wong" <Alistair Wong@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:DA956B40-736A-4A10-A11D-BDAAC07FDACF@.microsoft.com...
>I do not have any experience with MS SQL. I'm a hardware engineer. I focus
> mainly on the servers hardware and connectivity.
> I was wondering, is it possible to cluster 2 (or more) nodes running all
> nodes on active / active as a single MS SQL database system? The servers
> are
> connecting to a common shared storage system.
> Is this possible? This is more of a scale out strategy.
> Thanks

Tuesday, February 14, 2012

Clustered SQL Server 2000 is not seen by fn_virtualservernodes()

Hello,
Firstly I will provide some background. Few weeks before I started
work as database administrator but without cluster experience, and few
days ago I got a project to add sql serve pasive node to Windows 2003
cluster, I looked the internet but no serious sollutions wasn't find.
Nobody in company has idea how SQL Server was installed on this
cluster. Cluster consist of two machines with cluster services and
storage resurces installed, one has sql insatlled second, added later,
is waiting for my instalation. Cluster resuorces directing on active
SQL instance.
Before adding node quest I did some checks and found out that existing
sql node isn't recognize by fn_virtualservernodes() function. When I
wanted to add node according to Microsoft
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/sql/2000/maintain/failclus.mspx
I got error "Another Virtual Server of the same name exists on the
network error".
And finally my questions do have idea how to add second SQL node to
this configuration?
Or do I have to uninstall active sql serevr and start standard sql
serevr instalation on cluster?
Any help appreciate.
Regards,
BartekBartolo wrote:
> Hello,
> Firstly I will provide some background. Few weeks before I started
> work as database administrator but without cluster experience, and few
> days ago I got a project to add sql serve pasive node to Windows 2003
> cluster, I looked the internet but no serious sollutions wasn't find.
> Nobody in company has idea how SQL Server was installed on this
> cluster. Cluster consist of two machines with cluster services and
> storage resurces installed, one has sql insatlled second, added later,
> is waiting for my instalation. Cluster resuorces directing on active
> SQL instance.
> Before adding node quest I did some checks and found out that existing
> sql node isn't recognize by fn_virtualservernodes() function. When I
> wanted to add node according to Microsoft
> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/sql/2000/maintain/failclus.mspx
> I got error "Another Virtual Server of the same name exists on the
> network error".
> And finally my questions do have idea how to add second SQL node to
> this configuration?
> Or do I have to uninstall active sql serevr and start standard sql
> serevr instalation on cluster?
> Any help appreciate.
> Regards,
> Bartek
hi Bartek,
I have few years of experience with MSCS and MSSQL. I setup SQL on MSCS
several times but never tried to add node later. AFAIK you need to
uninstall sql server and then install it again. This is not hard to do.
good luck and hth|||Thanks a lot Zarko!
It seems I have to take into account uninstallation and installation
from the very begining.
Best regards,
Bartek
On 7 Lut, 11:39, Zarko Jovanovic <mind_lessIsHsAsTsEsSsPsA...@.inet.hr>
wrote:
> Bartolo wrote:
> > Hello,
> > Firstly I will provide some background. Few weeks before I started
> > work as database administrator but without cluster experience, and few
> > days ago I got a project to add sql serve pasive node to Windows 2003
> > cluster, I looked the internet but no serious sollutions wasn't find.
> > Nobody in company has idea how SQL Server was installed on this
> > cluster. Cluster consist of two machines with cluster services and
> > storage resurces installed, one has sql insatlled second, added later,
> > is waiting for my instalation. Cluster resuorces directing on active
> > SQL instance.
> > Before adding node quest I did some checks and found out that existing
> > sql node isn't recognize by fn_virtualservernodes() function. When I
> > wanted to add node according to Microsoft
> >http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/sql/2000/maintain/failcl...
> > I got error "Another Virtual Server of the same name exists on the
> > network error".
> > And finally my questions do have idea how to add second SQL node to
> > this configuration?
> > Or do I have to uninstall active sql serevr and start standard sql
> > serevr instalation on cluster?
> > Any help appreciate.
> > Regards,
> > Bartek
> hi Bartek,
> I have few years of experience with MSCS and MSSQL. I setup SQL on MSCS
> several times but never tried to add node later. AFAIK you need to
> uninstall sql server and then install it again. This is not hard to do.
> good luck and hth

Clustered SQL Server 2000 is not seen by fn_virtualservernodes()

Hello,
Firstly I will provide some background. Few weeks before I started
work as database administrator but without cluster experience, and few
days ago I got a project to add sql serve pasive node to Windows 2003
cluster, I looked the internet but no serious sollutions wasn't find.
Nobody in company has idea how SQL Server was installed on this
cluster. Cluster consist of two machines with cluster services and
storage resurces installed, one has sql insatlled second, added later,
is waiting for my instalation. Cluster resuorces directing on active
SQL instance.
Before adding node quest I did some checks and found out that existing
sql node isn't recognize by fn_virtualservernodes() function. When I
wanted to add node according to Microsoft
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/sql/2000/maintain/failclus.mspx
I got error "Another Virtual Server of the same name exists on the
network error".
And finally my questions do have idea how to add second SQL node to
this configuration?
Or do I have to uninstall active sql serevr and start standard sql
serevr instalation on cluster?
Any help appreciate.
Regards,
Bartek
Thanks a lot Zarko!
It seems I have to take into account uninstallation and installation
from the very begining.
Best regards,
Bartek
On 7 Lut, 11:39, Zarko Jovanovic <mind_lessIsHsAsTsEsSsPsA...@.inet.hr>
wrote:
> Bartolo wrote:
>
>
> hi Bartek,
> I have few years of experience with MSCS and MSSQL. I setup SQL on MSCS
> several times but never tried to add node later. AFAIK you need to
> uninstall sql server and then install it again. This is not hard to do.
> good luck and hth

Clustered sql binn directory

Hi I do not have any experience of clustered servers
I have some software that needs some dll's placed into the directory below
which an extended strored proc uses to verify and run internal code.
C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\MSSQL<instancename>\Binn
this works perfect on single Sql server instances or named instances
If two servers are set as clustered and both are active. Does anyone know
how the structure of the sql binn directories are laid out. If I have an
extened proc that checks a dll in the sql instance binn directory where or
how is this named for clustered servers.
Or has anyone used extended procs with clustered servers?
thanks for any advice
Sammy
I use extended stored procedures with clustered SQL regularly. The SQL
clustered and non-clustered binary structure is exactly the same. They only
difference is the structure is paralleled on each node. Therefore, you have
to place the appropriate DLL in the same directory on all the nodes.
Geoff N. Hiten
Senior Database Administrator
Microsoft SQL Server MVP
"Sammy" <Sammy@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:EF42B68E-1D9B-4D2C-91D7-74273953E5CD@.microsoft.com...
> Hi I do not have any experience of clustered servers
> I have some software that needs some dll's placed into the directory
> below
> which an extended strored proc uses to verify and run internal code.
> C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\MSSQL<instancename>\Binn
> this works perfect on single Sql server instances or named instances
>
> If two servers are set as clustered and both are active. Does anyone know
> how the structure of the sql binn directories are laid out. If I have an
> extened proc that checks a dll in the sql instance binn directory where or
> how is this named for clustered servers.
> Or has anyone used extended procs with clustered servers?
> thanks for any advice
> Sammy
>
>
>
>

Friday, February 10, 2012

Clustered DB Server

I had prior experience in clustering DB servers. But at that time, the OS did seem to be mature enough to handle clustering. Does any one have more current experience about how clustering sql database servers runs. Faster or slower? Any performance gain at all? Any opinions will be appreciated.Sorry! I made the wrong statement. I meant to say when I did the clustering, the OS did NOT seem to be able to handle it very well. I am looking for opinions from any one who has experience in clustering in a Windows 2000 or 2003(perferrable) environment.|||Windows 2000 seems to have made decent progress in this area, but we have had extraordinary pain with our hardware not liking life. Be forewarned that although MS says it is up and running 24x7, there are some hardware fixes that will bring you down entirely. Notably anything to do with your disk array/cabinet. Also make sure that you place the quorum on its own physical (that's right, physical) device. I know the quorum takes up all of maybe 100MB, but MS suggests this, in order to keep the server running. Basically, if you generate enough I/O on the disk, you can lose sight of the quorum disk, which means the cluster will fall down and go boom.